Portrait_AF

 

Dr. Anna Foerster

E-Mail: foerster@uni-trier.de
Raum: JU3.90
Tel.: +49 651 201-1866

Termine nur nach Vereinbarung.

 

Open Science Framework

Google Scholar

ResearchGate

ORCID

Research Interests

I conduct research on human action control with a focus on lying, cheating and honest mistakes. I am currently investigating the integration of perception and action when actions go awry in my own project in collaboration with Birte Moeller, Maria Nemeth, Christian Frings and Roland Pfister.

Publications

2023/2024/ in press

33

 Reis, M., Foerster, A., Zettler I., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2023). Sticky tradition impedes selection of creative ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 153(1), 268-273.

https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001490

OSF
32

Reis, M., Pfister, R., Kunde, W., & Foerster, A. (2023). Creative thinking does not promote dishonesty. Royal Society Open Science, 10(12), 1-9.

https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230879

OSF
31

Frings, C., Foerster, A., Moeller, B., Pastötter, B., & Pfister R. (2023). The relation between learning and stimulus-response binding. Psychological Review.

https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000449

 
30

Foerster, A., Moeller, B., Frings, C., & Pfister, R. (2023). What is left after an error? Towards a comprehensive account of goal-based binding and retrieval. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics85(1), 120–139.

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02609-w

OSF
29

Reis, M., Pfister, R., & Foerster, A. (2023). Cognitive load promotes honesty. Psychological Research, 87(3), 826–844.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01686-8

OSF
28

Foerster, A., Pfister, R., Wirth, R., & Kunde, W. (2023). Post-execution monitoring in dishonesty. Psychological Research, 87, 845-861.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01691-x

OSF

2021/2022

27

Parmar, J., Foerster, A., Pfister, R., & Rothermund, K. (2022). Frankly, my error, I don’t give a damn: Retrieval of goal-based but not coactivation-based bindings after erroneous responses. Journal of Cognition, 5(1), 1-12.

https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.224

OSF
26

Foerster, A., Schiltenwolf, M., Dignath, D., & Pfister, R. (2022). Binding error-induced control states. Journal of Cognition, 5(1), 1-18.

https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.213

OSF
25

Pfister, R., Bogon, J., Foerster, A., Kunde, W., & Moeller, B. (2022). Binding and retrieval of response durations: Subtle evidence for episodic processing of continuous movement features. Journal of Cognition, 5(1), 1-16.

https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.212

OSF
24

Foerster, A., Steinhauser, M., Schwarz, K. A., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2022). Error cancellation. Royal Society Open Science, 9(3), 1-17.

https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210397

OSF
23

Foerster, A., Moeller, B., Huffman, G., Kunde, W., Frings, C., & Pfister, R. (2022). The human cognitive system corrects traces of error commission on the fly. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(6), 1419–1432.

https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001139

OSF
22

Pfister, R., & Foerster, A. (2022). How to measure post-error slowing: The case of pre-error speeding. Behavior Research Methods, 54(1), 435–443.

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01631-4

OSF
21

Foerster, A., Rothermund, K., Parmar, J. J., Moeller, B., Frings, C., & Pfister, R. (2021). Goal-based binding of irrelevant stimulus features for action slips. Experimental Psychology, 68(4), 206–213.

https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000525

OSF

2019/2020

20

Wirth, R., Foerster, A., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2020). Design choices: Empirical recommendations for designing two-dimensional finger-tracking experiments. Behavior Research Methods, 52(6), 2394–2416.

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01409-0

OSF
19

Foerster, A., Schmidts, C., Kleinsorge, T., & Kunde, W. (2020). Affective distraction along the flexibility-stability continuum. Cognition and Emotion, 34(3), 438–449.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1635084

OSF
18

Schmidts, C., Foerster, A., & Kunde, W. (2020). Situation selection and cognitive conflict: Explicit knowledge is necessary for conflict avoidance. Cognition and Emotion, 34(6), 1199–1209.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2020.1736006

 
17

Kunde, W., Foerster, A., Weigelt, M., & Dignath, D. (2019). On the ball: Short-term consequences of movement fakes. Acta Psychologica, 198, 102872.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102872

OSF
16

Schmidts, C., Foerster, A., Kleinsorge, T., & Kunde, W. (2020). Proactive control of affective distraction: Experience-based but not expectancy-based. Cognition, 194, 104072.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104072

 
15

Foerster, A., Wirth, R., Berghoefer, F. L., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2019). Capacity limitations of dishonesty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(6), 943–961.

https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000510

OSF
14

Pfeuffer, C. U., Pfister, R., Foerster, A., Stecher, F., & Kiesel, A. (2019). Binding lies: Flexible retrieval of honest and dishonest behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(2), 157–173.

https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000600

 
13

Pfister, R., Wirth, R., Weller, L., Foerster, A., & Schwarz, K. A. (2019). Taking shortcuts: Cognitive conflict during motivated rule-breaking. Journal of Economic Psychology, 71, 138–147.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2018.06.005

OSF
12

Schmidts, C., Foerster, A., & Kunde, W. (2019). Conflict modification: Predictable production of congruent situations facilitates responding in a stroop task. Psychological Research, 83(8), 1722–1732.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1021-8

 

2017/2018

11

Wirth, R., Foerster, A., Herbort, O., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2018). This is how to be a rule breaker. Advances in Cognitive Psychology14(1), 21–37.

https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0235-2

OSF
10

Wirth, R., Foerster, A., Rendel, H., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2018). Rule-violations sensitise towards negative and authority-related stimuli. Cognition and Emotion, 32(3), 480-493.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2017.1316706

 
9

Foerster, A., Pfister, R., Schmidts, C., Dignath, D., Wirth, R., & Kunde, W. (2018). Focused cognitive control in dishonesty: Evidence for predominantly transient conflict adaptation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(4), 578–602.

https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000480

OSF
8

Foerster, A., Wirth, R., Herbort, O., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2017). Lying upside-down: Alibis reverse cognitive burdens of dishonesty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 23(3), 301–319.

https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000129

OSF
7

Foerster, A.*, Pfister, R.*, Reuss, H., & Kunde, W. (2017). Commentary: Feeling the conflict: The crucial role of conflict experience in adaptation. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1405.

(* equal author contribution)

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01405

OSF
6

Foerster, A., Wirth, R., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2017). The dishonest mind set in sequence. Psychological Research, 81(4), 878–899.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0780-3

 

2016 and before

5

Pfister, R., Wirth, R., Schwarz, K. A., Foerster, A., Steinhauser, M., & Kunde, W. (2016). The electrophysiological signature of deliberate rule violation. Psychophysiology, 53, 1870-1877.

https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12771

 
4

Wirth, R., Pfister, R., Foerster, A., Huestegge, L., & Kunde, W. (2016). Pushing the rules: Effects and aftereffects of deliberate rule violations. Psychological Research, 80(5), 838–852.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0690-9

 
3

Foerster, A., Gray, R., & Cañal-Bruland, R. (2015). Size estimates remain stable in the face of differences in performance outcome variability in an aiming task. Consciousness and Cognition, 33, 47–52.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.12.004

 
2

Pfister, R., Foerster, A., & Kunde, W. (2014). Pants on fire: The electrophysiological signature of telling a lie. Social Neuroscience, 9(6), 562–572.

https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2014.934392

 
1

Foerster, A., Pfister, R., Schmidts, C., Dignath, D., & Kunde, W. (2013). Honesty saves time (and justifications). Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 473.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00473