Portrait von Roland Pfister

 

Prof. Dr. Roland Pfister

E-Mail: roland.pfister@uni-trier.de
Room: JU3.70
Phone: +49 651 201-1867

 

 

 

Open Science Framework

Google Scholar

ORCID

Publications

Showcase

The following articles are selected highlights from topics that I am genuinely interested in. For a full list of publications, please see below or have a look at my profile at Google Scholar.

Deliberate rule violations

 

Pfister, R., Wirth, R., Weller, L., Foerster, A., & Schwarz, K. A. (2019). Taking shortcuts: Cognitive conflict during motivated rule-breaking. Journal of Economic Psychology71, 138-147.

https://doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2018.06.005

 
 

Pfister, R., Wirth, R., Schwarz, K., Steinhauser, M., & Kunde, W. (2016). Burdens of non-conformity: Motor execution reveals cognitive conflict during deliberate rule violations. Cognition147, 93-99.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.11.009

 

 

Perception & action control

 

Pfister, R. (2019). Effect-based action control with body-related effects: Implications for empirical approaches to ideomotor action control. Psychological Review126(1), 153-161.

https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000140

 

 
 

Pfister, R., Dignath, D., Hommel, B., & Kunde, W. (2013). It takes two to imitate: Anticipation and imitation in social interaction. Psychological Science24(10), 2117-2121.

https://doi: 10.1177/0956797613489139

Statistics & methodology

 

Pfister, R. (2021). Variability of Bayes Factor estimates in Bayesian analysis of variance. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology17(1), 40-45.

https://doi: 10.20982/tqmp.17.1.p042

 
 

Pfister, R., & Janczyk, M. (2013). Confidence intervals for two sample means: Calculation, interpretation, and a few simple rules. Advances in Cognitive Psychology9(2), 74-80.

https://doi: 10.5709/acp-0133-x

 

History of psychology

 

Schwarz, K. A., & Pfister, R. (2016). Scientific psychology in the 18th century: A historical rediscovery. Perspectives on Psychological Science11(3), 399-407.

https://doi: 10.1177/1745691616635601

 
 

Pfister, R., & Janczyk, M. (2012). Harleß' Apparatus of Will: 150 years later. Psychological Research76(5), 561-565.

httsp://doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0362-3

 

 

Journal Articles

2023/2024/ in press

137

Pfister, R., Schwarz, K. A., Holzmann, P., Reis, M., Yogeeswaran, K., & Kunde, W. (2023). Headlines win elections: Mere exposure to fictitious news media alters voting behavior. PLOS ONE.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289341

OSF
136

Reis, M., Pfister, R., Kunde, W., & Foerster, A. (2023). Creative thinking does not promote dishonesty. Royal Society Open Science, 10(12), 1-9.

https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230879

OSF
135

Frings, C., Foerster, A., Moeller, B., Pastötter, B., & Pfister R. (2023). The relation between learning and stimulus-response binding. Psychological Review.

https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000449

 
134

Reis, M., Foerster, A., Zettler I., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2023). Sticky tradition impedes selection of creative ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Advance online publication.

https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001490

OSF
133

Schwarz, K. A., Tonn, S., Büttner, J., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2023). Sense of agency in social hierarchies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(10), 2957–2976.

https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001426

OSF
132

Reis, M., Pfister, R., & Schwarz, K. A. (2023). The value of control. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 36(4).

https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2325

OSF
131

Bogon, J., Köllnberger, K., Thomaschke, R., & Pfister, R. (2023). Binding and retrieval of temporal action features: Probing the precision level of feature representations in action planning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 49(7), 989–998.

https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001136

OSF
130

Foerster, A., Moeller, B., Frings, C., & Pfister, R. (2023). What is left after an error? Towards a comprehensive account of goal-based binding and retrieval. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 85(1), 120–139.

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02609-w

OSF
129

Foerster, A., Pfister, R., Wirth, R., & Kunde, W. (2023). Post-execution monitoring in dishonesty. Psychological Research, 87(3), 845–861.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01691-x

OSF
128

Janczyk, M., Giesen, C. G., Moeller, B., Dignath, D., & Pfister, R. (2023). Perception and action as viewed from the Theory of Event Coding: A multi-lab replication and effect size estimation of common experimental designs. Psychological Research, 87(4), 1012–1042.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01705-8

OSF
127

Pfister, R., Neszmélyi, B., & Kunde, W. (2023). Response durations: A flexible, no-cost tool for psychological science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 32(2), 160–166.

https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214221141692

OSF
126

Reis, M., Pfister, R., & Foerster, A. (2023). Cognitive load promotes honesty. Psychological Research, 87(3), 826–844.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01686-8

OSF
125

Tonn, S., Schaaf, M., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2023). Action representations in prevention behavior: Evidence from motor execution. Cognition, 234, 105370.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105370

OSF

 

2021/2022

124

Eck, J., Dignath, D., Kalckert, A., & Pfister, R. (2022). Instant disembodiment of virtual body parts. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 84(8), 2725–2740.

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02544-w

OSF
123

Foerster, A., Moeller, B., Huffman, G., Kunde, W., Frings, C., & Pfister, R. (2022). The human cognitive system corrects traces of error commission on the fly. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(6), 1419–1432.

https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001139

OSF
122

Foerster, A., Schiltenwolf, M., Dignath, D., & Pfister, R. (2022). Binding error-induced control states. Journal of Cognition, 5(1), 24.

https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.213

OSF
121

Foerster, A., Steinhauser, M., Schwarz, K. A., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2022). Error cancellation. Royal Society Open Science, 9(3), 210397.

https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210397

OSF
120

Moeller, B., & Pfister, R. (2022). Ideomotor learning: Time to generalize a longstanding principle. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 140, 104782.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104782

 
119

Neszmélyi, B., Weller, L., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2022). Social action effects: Representing predicted partner responses in social interactions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 16, 837495.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.837495

 
118

Parmar, J., Foerster, A., Pfister, R., & Rothermund, K. (2022). Frankly, my error, I don’t give a damn: Retrieval of goal-based but not coactivation-based bindings after erroneous responses. Journal of Cognition, 5(1), 34.

https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.224

OSF
117

Pfister, R., Bogon, J., Foerster, A., Kunde, W., & Moeller, B. (2022). Binding and retrieval of response durations: Subtle evidence for episodic processing of continuous movement features. Journal of Cognition, 5(1), 23.

https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.212

OSF
116

Pfister, R., & Foerster, A. (2022). How to measure post-error slowing: The case of pre-error speeding. Behavior Research Methods, 54(1), 435–443.

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01631-4

OSF
115

Reis, M., & Pfister, R. (2022). Being observed does not boost rule retrieval. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 18(3), 173–178.

https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0359-8

OSF
114

Schwarz, K. A., Klaffehn, A. L., Hauke-Forman, N., Muth, F. V., & Pfister, R. (2022). Never run a changing system: Action-effect contingency shapes prospective agency. Cognition, 229, 105250.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105250

OSF
113

Varga, S., Pfister, R., Neszmélyi, B., Kunde, W., & Horváth, J. (2022). Binding of task-irrelevant action features and auditory action effects. Journal of Cognition, 5(1), 35.

https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.225

OSF
112

Dignath, D., Born, G., Eder, A., Topolinski, S., & Pfister, R. (2021). Imitation of action-effects increases social affiliation. Psychological Research, 85(5), 1922–1933.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01378-1

OSF
111

Foerster, A., Rothermund, K., Parmar, J. J., Moeller, B., Frings, C., & Pfister, R. (2021). Goal-based binding of irrelevant stimulus features for action slips. Experimental Psychology, 68(4), 206–213.

https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000525

OSF
110

Klaffehn, A. L., Sellmann, F. B., Kirsch, W., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2021). Temporal binding as multisensory integration: Manipulating perceptual certainty of actions and their effects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 83(8), 3135–3145.

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02314-0

OSF
109

Pfister, R. (2021). Variability of Bayes Factor estimates in Bayesian Analysis of Variance. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 17(1), 40–45.

https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.17.1.p040

OSF
108

Pfister, R., Klaffehn, A. L., Kalckert, A., Kunde, W., & Dignath, D. (2021). How to lose a hand: Sensory updating drives disembodiment. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(3), 827–833.

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01854-0

OSF
107

Pfister, R.*, Tonn, S.*, Weller, L., Kunde, W., & Schwarz, K. A. (2021). To prevent means to know: Explicit but no implicit agency for prevention behavior. Cognition, 206, 104489.

(* equal author contribution)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104489

OSF
106

Tonn, S., Pfister, R., Klaffehn, A. L., Weller, L., & Schwarz, K. A. (2021). Two faces of temporal binding: Action- and effect-binding are not correlated. Consciousness and Cognition, 96, 103219.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2021.103219

OSF

 

2019/2020

105

Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Moeller, B., Möller, M., Pfister, R., & Philipp, A. (2020). Binding and retrieval in action control (BRAC). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(5), 375–387.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004

 
104

Kirsch, W., Pfister, R., & Kunde, W. (2020). On why objects appear smaller in the visual periphery. Psychological Science, 31(1), 88–96.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619892624

OSF
103

Lelonkiewicz, J. R., Gambi, C., Weller, L., & Pfister, R. (2020). Action–effect anticipation and temporal adaptation in social interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46(4), 335–349.

https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000717

OSF
102

Liesner, M., Kirsch, W., Pfister, R., & Kunde, W. (2020). Spatial action–effect binding depends on type of action–effect transformation. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(5), 2531–2543.

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02013-2

OSF
101

Pfister, R., Weller, L., & Kunde, W. (2020). When actions go awry: Monitoring partner errors and machine malfunctions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(9), 1778–1787.

https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000748

OSF
100

Richardson, B., Pfister, R., & Fournier, L. R. (2020). Free-choice and forced-choice actions: Shared representations and conservation of cognitive effort. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(5), 2516–2530.

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-01986-4

 
99

Thébault, G., Pfister, R., Michalland, A.-H., & Brouillet, D. (2020). Flexible weighting of body-related effects in action production. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(9), 1360–1367.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820911793

 
98

Weller, L., Pfister, R., & Kunde, W. (2020). Anticipation in sociomotor actions: Similar effects for in- and outgroup interactions. Acta Psychologica, 207, 103087.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103087

OSF
97

Weller, L., Schwarz, K. A., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2020). Something from nothing: Agency for deliberate nonactions. Cognition, 196, 104136.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104136

OSF
96

Wirth, R., Foerster, A., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2020). Design choices: Empirical recommendations for designing two-dimensional finger-tracking experiments. Behavior Research Methods, 52(6), 2394–2416.

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01409-0

OSF
95

Foerster, A., Wirth, R., Berghoefer, F. L., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2019). Capacity limitations of dishonesty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(6), 943–961.

https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000510

OSF
94

Fröber, K., Pfister, R., & Dreisbach, G. (2019). Increasing reward prospect promotes cognitive flexibility: Direct evidence from voluntary task switching with double registration. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(8), 1926–1944.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818819449

 
93

Jusyte, A., Pfister, R., Gehrer, N., & Schönenberg, M. (2019). Risky business! Behavioral bias and motivational salience of rule-violations in children with conduct disorder. Psychiatry Research, 271, 740–746.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.11.001

 
92

Klaffehn, A. L., Baess, P., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2019). Sensory attenuation prevails when controlling for temporal predictability of self- and externally generated tones. Neuropsychologia, 132, 107145.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107145

OSF
91

Moeller, B., Pfister, R., Kunde, W., & Frings, C. (2019). Selective binding of stimulus, response, and effect features. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1627–1632.

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01646-1

 
90

Pfeuffer, C. U., Pfister, R., Foerster, A., Stecher, F., & Kiesel, A. (2019). Binding lies: Flexible retrieval of honest and dishonest behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(2), 157–173.

https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000600

OSF
89

Pfister, R. (2019). Effect-based action control with body-related effects: Implications for empirical approaches to ideomotor action control. Psychological Review, 126(1), 153–161.

https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000140

 
88

Pfister, R., Frings, C., & Moeller, B. (2019). The role of congruency for distractor-response binding: A caveat. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 15(2), 127–132.

https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0262-1

OSF
87

Pfister, R., Wirth, R., Weller, L., Foerster, A., & Schwarz, K. A. (2019). Taking shortcuts: Cognitive conflict during motivated rule-breaking. Journal of Economic Psychology, 71, 138–147.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2018.06.005

OSF
86

Riechelmann, E., Weller, L., Huestegge, L., Böckler, A., & Pfister, R. (2019). Revisiting intersubjective action-effect binding: No evidence for social moderators. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81(6), 1991–2002.

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01715-6

OSF
85

Schwarz, K. A., Sprenger, C., Hidalgo, P., Pfister, R., Diekhof, E. K., & Büchel, C. (2019). How stereotypes affect pain. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 8626.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45044-y

 
84

Schwarz, K. A., Weller, L., Klaffehn, A. L., & Pfister, R. (2019). The effects of action choice on temporal binding, agency ratings, and their correlation. Consciousness and Cognition, 75, 102807.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2019.102807

OSF
83

Schwarz, K. A., Weller, L., Pfister, R., & Kunde, W. (2019). Connecting action control and agency: Does action-effect binding affect temporal binding? Consciousness and Cognition, 76, 102833.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2019.102833

OSF
82

Weller, L., Pfister, R., & Kunde, W. (2019). Sociomotor actions: Anticipated partner responses are primarily represented in terms of spatial, not anatomical features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(8), 1104–1118.

https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000658

OSF
81

Wirth, R., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2019). How not to fall for the white bear: Combined frequency and recency manipulations diminish negation effects on overt behavior. Journal of Cognition, 2(1), 11.

https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.62

OSF

 

2018/2017

80

Dignath, D., Lotze-Hermes, P., Farmer, H., & Pfister, R. (2018). Contingency and contiguity of imitative behaviour affect social affiliation. Psychological Research, 82(4), 819–831.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0854-x

OSF
79

Foerster, A., Pfister, R., Schmidts, C., Dignath, D., Wirth, R., & Kunde, W. (2018). Focused cognitive control in dishonesty: Evidence for predominantly transient conflict adaptation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(4), 578–602.

https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000480

OSF
78

Holtfrerich, S. K., Pfister, R., Gammal, A. T., Bellon, E., & Diekhof, E. K. (2018). Endogenous testosterone and exogenous oxytocin influence the response to baby schema in the female brain. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 7672.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26020-4

 
77

Klaffehn, A. L., Schwarz, K. A., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2018). Similar task-switching performance of real-time strategy and first-person shooter players: Implications for cognitive training. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 2(3), 240–258.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-018-0066-3

OSF
76

Kunde, W., Weller, L., & Pfister, R. (2018). Sociomotor action control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(3), 917–931.

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1316-6

 
75

Pfister, R., & Schwarz, K. A. (2018). Should we pre-date the beginning of scientific psychology to 1787? Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2481.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02481

 
74

Schwarz, K. A., Burger, S., Dignath, D., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2018). Action-effect binding and agency. Consciousness and Cognition, 65, 304–309.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.10.001

OSF
73

Schwarz, K. A., Pfister, R., & Büchel, C. (2018). The being a patient effect: Negative expectations based on group labeling and corresponding treatment affect patient performance. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 23(1), 99–105.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2017.1332375

 
72

Schwarz, K. A., Pfister, R., Kluge, M., Weller, L., & Kunde, W. (2018). Do we see it or not? Sensory attenuation in the visual domain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(3), 418–430.

https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000353

OSF
71

Schwarz, K. A.*, Pfister, R.*, Wirth, R., & Kunde, W. (2018). Dissociating action-effect activation and effect-based response selection. Acta Psychologica, 188, 16–24.

(* equal author contribution)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.05.007

OSF
70

Trafimow, D., Amrhein, V., Areshenkoff, C. N., Barrera-Causil, C. J., Beh, E. J., Bilgiç, Y. K., Bono, R., Bradley, M. T., Briggs, W. M., Cepeda-Freyre, H. A., Chaigneau, S. E., Ciocca, D. R., Correa, J. C., Cousineau, D., De Boer, M. R., Dhar, S. S., Dolgov, I., Gómez-Benito, J., Grendar, M., … Marmolejo-Ramos, F. (2018). Manipulating the alpha level cannot cure significance testing. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 699.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00699

 
69

Weller, L., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2018). Disarming the gunslinger effect: Reaction beats intention for cooperative actions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(2), 761–766.

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1462-5

OSF
68

Weller, L., Schwarz, K. A., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2018). My mistake? Enhanced error processing for commanded compared to passively observed actions. Psychophysiology, 55(6), Article e13057.

https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13057

 
67

Wirth, R., Foerster, A., Herbort, O., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2018). This is how to be a rule breaker. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 14(1), 21–37.

https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0235-2

OSF
66

Wirth, R., Foerster, A., Rendel, H., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2018). Rule-violations sensitise towards negative and authority-related stimuli. Cognition and Emotion, 32(3), 480–493.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2017.1316706

 
65

Eder, A. B., Pfister, R., Dignath, D., & Hommel, B. (2017). Anticipatory affect during action preparation: Evidence from backward compatibility in dual-task performance. Cognition and Emotion, 31(6), 1211–1224.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1208151

 
64

Foerster, A.*, Pfister, R.*, Reuss, H., & Kunde, W. (2017). Commentary: Feeling the conflict: The crucial role of conflict experience in adaptation. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1405.

(* equal author contribution)

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01405

OSF
63

Foerster, A., Wirth, R., Herbort, O., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2017). Lying upside-down: Alibis reverse cognitive burdens of dishonesty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 23(3), 301–319.

https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000129

OSF
62

Foerster, A., Wirth, R., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2017). The dishonest mind set in sequence. Psychological Research, 81(4), 878–899.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0780-3

 
61

Hommel, B., Lippelt, D. P., Gurbuz, E., & Pfister, R. (2017). Contributions of expected sensory and affective action effects to action selection and performance: Evidence from forced- and free-choice tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(3), 821–827.

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1139-x

 
60

Jusyte, A., Pfister, R., Mayer, S. V., Schwarz, K. A., Wirth, R., Kunde, W., & Schönenberg, M. (2017). Smooth criminal: Convicted rule-breakers show reduced cognitive conflict during deliberate rule violations. Psychological Research, 81(5), 939–946.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0798-6

 
59

Muth, F. V., Schwarz, K. A., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2017). Feeling watched: What determines perceived observation? Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4(3), 298–309.

https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000127

OSF
58

Pfeuffer, C. U., Moutsopoulou, K., Pfister, R., Waszak, F., & Kiesel, A. (2017). The power of words: On item-specific stimulus–response associations formed in the absence of action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(2), 328–347.

https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000317

 
57

Pfister, R., Schwarz, K. A., Wirth, R., & Lindner, I. (2017). My command, my act: Observation inflation in face-to-face interactions. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 13(2), 166–176.

https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0217-7

 

OSF
56

Pfister, R., Weller, L., Dignath, D., & Kunde, W. (2017). What or when? The impact of anticipated social action effects is driven by action-effect compatibility, not delay. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(7), 2132–2142.

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1371-0

OSF
55

Weller, L., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2017). Non-action effect binding: A critical re-assessment. Acta Psychologica, 180, 137–146.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.09.001

OSF
54

Weller, L., Schwarz, K. A., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2017). Was it me? – Filling the interval between action and effects increases agency but not sensory attenuation. Biological Psychology, 123, 241–249.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.12.015

 

 

2016/2015

53

Kirsch, W., Pfister, R., & Kunde, W. (2016). Spatial action-effect binding. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(1), 133–142.

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0997-z

 
52

Moeller, B., Frings, C., & Pfister, R. (2016). The structure of distractor-response bindings: Conditions for configural and elemental integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(4), 464–479.

https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000158

 
51

Moeller, B., Pfister, R., Kunde, W., & Frings, C. (2016). A common mechanism behind distractor-response and response-effect binding? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(4), 1074–1086.

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1063-1

 
50

Pfister, R., & Janczyk, M. (2016). schoRsch: An R package for analyzing and reporting factorial experiments. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 12(2), 147–151.

https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.12.2.p147

 
49

Pfister, R., Wirth, R., Schwarz, K. A., Foerster, A., Steinhauser, M., & Kunde, W. (2016). The electrophysiological signature of deliberate rule violations: Electrophysiology of deliberate rule violations. Psychophysiology, 53(12), 1870–1877.

https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12771

 
48

Pfister, R., Wirth, R., Schwarz, K. A., Steinhauser, M., & Kunde, W. (2016). Burdens of non-conformity: Motor execution reveals cognitive conflict during deliberate rule violations. Cognition, 147, 93–99.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.11.009

 
47

Schroeder, P. A., Pfister, R., Kunde, W., Nuerk, H.-C., & Plewnia, C. (2016). Counteracting implicit conflicts by electrical inhibition of the prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(11), 1737–1748.

https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01001

 
46

Schwarz, K. A., & Pfister, R. (2016). Scientific psychology in the 18th century: A historical rediscovery. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(3), 399–407.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616635601

 
45

Schwarz, K. A., Pfister, R., & Büchel, C. (2016). Rethinking explicit expectations: Connecting placebos, social cognition, and contextual perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(6), 469–480.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.04.001

 
44

Wirth, R., Dignath, D., Pfister, R., Kunde, W., & Eder, A. B. (2016). Attracted by rewards: Disentangling the motivational influence of rewarding and punishing targets and distractors. Motivation Science, 2(3), 143–156.

https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000037

OSF
43

Wirth, R., Pfister, R., Brandes, J., & Kunde, W. (2016). Stroking me softly: Body-related effects in effect-based action control. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(6), 1755–1770.

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1151-2

 
42

Wirth, R., Pfister, R., Foerster, A., Huestegge, L., & Kunde, W. (2016). Pushing the rules: Effects and aftereffects of deliberate rule violations. Psychological Research, 80(5), 838–852.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0690-9

 
41

Wirth, R., Pfister, R., & Kunde, W. (2016). Asymmetric transfer effects between cognitive and affective task disturbances. Cognition and Emotion, 30(3), 399–416.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1009002

 
40

Wunsch, K., Pfister, R., Henning, A., Aschersleben, G., & Weigelt, M. (2016). No interrelation of motor planning and executive functions across young ages. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1031.

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01031

 
39

Janczyk, M., Yamaguchi, M., Proctor, R. W., & Pfister, R. (2015). Response-effect compatibility with complex actions: The case of wheel rotations. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(3), 930–940.

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0828-7

 
38

Melcher, T., Pfister, R., Busmann, M., Schlüter, M.-C., Leyhe, T., & Gruber, O. (2015). Functional characteristics of control adaptation in intermodal sensory processing. Brain and Cognition, 96, 43–55.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2015.03.003

 
37

Schroeder, P. A., & Pfister, R. (2015). Arbitrary numbers counter fair decisions: Trails of markedness in card distribution. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 240.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00240

 
36

Wirth, R., Pfister, R., Janczyk, M., & Kunde, W. (2015). Through the portal: Effect anticipation in the central bottleneck. Acta Psychologica, 160, 141–151.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.07.007

 

 

2014/2013

35

Dignath, D., Pfister, R., Eder, A. B., Kiesel, A., & Kunde, W. (2014a). Representing the hyphen in action–effect associations: Automatic acquisition and bidirectional retrieval of action–effect intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(6), 1701–1712.

https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000022

 
34

Dignath, D., Pfister, R., Eder, A. B., Kiesel, A., & Kunde, W. (2014b). Something in the way she moves—Movement trajectories reveal dynamics of self-control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(3), 809–816.

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0517-x

 
33

Janczyk, M., Pfister, R., Hommel, B., & Kunde, W. (2014). Who is talking in backward crosstalk? Disentangling response- from goal-conflict in dual-task performance. Cognition, 132(1), 30–43.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.03.001

 
32

Janczyk, M., Pfister, R., Wallmeier, G., & Kunde, W. (2014). Exceptions to the PRP effect? A comparison of prepared and unconditioned reflexes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(3), 776–786.

https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035548

 
31

Pfister, R., Dolk, T., Prinz, W., & Kunde, W. (2014). Joint response–effect compatibility. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(3), 817–822.

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0528-7

 
30

Pfister, R., Foerster, A., & Kunde, W. (2014). Pants on fire: The electrophysiological signature of telling a lie. Social Neuroscience, 9(6), 562-572.

https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2014.934392

 
29

Pfister, R., Janczyk, M., Gressmann, M., Fournier, L. R., & Kunde, W. (2014). Good vibrations? Vibrotactile self-stimulation reveals anticipation of body-related action effects in motor control. Experimental Brain Research, 232(3), 847–854.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3796-6

 
28

Pfister, R., Janczyk, M., Wirth, R., Dignath, D., & Kunde, W. (2014). Thinking with portals: Revisiting kinematic cues to intention. Cognition, 133(2), 464–473.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.07.012

OSF
27

Pfister, R.*, Melcher, T.*, Kiesel, A., Dechent, P., & Gruber, O. (2014). Neural correlates of ideomotor effect anticipations. Neuroscience, 259, 164–171.

(* equal author contribution)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.11.061

 
26

Pfister, R., Obhi, S. S., Rieger, M., & Wenke, D. (2014). Action and perception in social contexts: Intentional binding for social action effects. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article 667.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00667

 
25

Pfister, R.*, Pfeuffer, C. U.*, & Kunde, W. (2014). Perceiving by proxy: Effect-based action control with unperceivable effects. Cognition, 132(3), 251–261.

(* equal author contribution)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.04.012

 
24

Foerster, A., Pfister, R., Schmidts, C., Dignath, D., & Kunde, W. (2013). Honesty saves time (and justifications). Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 473.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00473

 
23

Heinemann, A., Pfister, R., & Janczyk, M. (2013). Manipulating number generation: Loud+long=large? Consciousness and Cognition, 22(4), 1332–1339.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.08.014

 
22

Janczyk, M., Pfister, R., & Kunde, W. (2013). Mice move smoothly: Irrelevant object variation affects perception, but not computer mouse actions. Experimental Brain Research, 231(1), 97–106.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3671-5

 
21

Melcher, T., Winter, D., Hommel, B., Pfister, R., Dechent, P., & Gruber, O. (2013). The neural substrate of the ideomotor principle revisited: Evidence for asymmetries in action-effect learning. Neuroscience, 231, 13–27.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.11.035

 
20

Pfister, R., Dignath, D., Hommel, B., & Kunde, W. (2013). It takes two to imitate: Anticipation and imitation in social interaction. Psychological Science, 24(10), 2117–2121.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613489139

OSF
19

Pfister, R., & Janczyk, M. (2013). Confidence intervals for two sample means: Calculation, interpretation, and a few simple rules. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 74–80.

https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0133-x

OSF
18

Pfister, R., & Kunde, W. (2013). Dissecting the response in response–effect compatibility. Experimental Brain Research, 224(4), 647–655.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3343-x

 
17

Pfister, R., Schroeder, P. A., & Kunde, W. (2013). SNARC struggles: Instant control over spatial–numerical associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(6), 1953–1958.

https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032991

 
16

Pfister, R., Schwarz, K. A., Janczyk, M., Dale, R., & Freeman, J. B. (2013). Good things peak in pairs: A note on the bimodality coefficient. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 700.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00700

 
15

Pfister, R., Schwarz, K., Carson, R., & Jancyzk, M. (2013). Easy methods for extracting individual regression slopes: Comparing SPSS, R, and Excel. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 72–78.

https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p072

 
14

Waszak, F., Pfister, R., & Kiesel, A. (2013). Top-down versus bottom-up: When instructions overcome automatic retrieval. Psychological Research, 77(5), 611–617.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-012-0459-3

 

 

2012/2011

13

Janczyk, M., Heinemann, A., & Pfister, R. (2012). Instant attraction: Immediate action-effect bindings occur for both, stimulus- and goal-driven actions. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 446.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00446

 
12

Janczyk, M., Pfister, R., Crognale, M. A., & Kunde, W. (2012). Effective rotations: Action effects determine the interplay of mental and manual rotations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(3), 489–501.

https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026997

 
11

Janczyk, M., Pfister, R., & Kunde, W. (2012). On the persistence of tool-based compatibility effects. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 220(1), 16–22.

https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000086

 
10

Kunde, W., Pfister, R., & Janczyk, M. (2012). The locus of tool-transformation costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(3), 703–714.

https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026315

 
9

Pfister, R., Heinemann, A., Kiesel, A., Thomaschke, R., & Janczyk, M. (2012). Do endogenous and exogenous action control compete for perception? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(2), 279–284.

https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026658

 
8

Pfister, R., & Janczyk, M. (2012). Harleß’ Apparatus of Will: 150 years later. Psychological Research, 76(5), 561–565.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0362-3

 
7

Pfister, R., Pohl, C., Kiesel, A., & Kunde, W. (2012). Your unconscious knows your name. PLoS ONE, 7(3), Article e32402.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032402

 
6

Pfister, R., Schwarz, K. A., & Janczyk, M. (2012). Ubi irritatio, ibi affluxus: A 19th century perspective on haemodynamic brain activity. Cortex, 48(8), 1061–1063.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.05.006

 
5

Pfister, R. (2011a). Gender effects in gaming research: A case for regression residuals? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(10), 603–606.

https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0547

 
4

Pfister, R. (2011b). Wardrobe malfunctions and the measurement of internet behaviour. Psychology, 2(3), 266–268.

https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2011.23042

OSF
3

Pfister, R., Kiesel, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2011). Learning at any rate: Action–effect learning for stimulus-based actions. Psychological Research, 75(1), 61–65.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-010-0288-1

 

 

2010 and before

2

Pfister, R., Kiesel, A., & Melcher, T. (2010). Adaptive control of ideomotor effect anticipations. Acta Psychologica, 135(3), 316–322.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.08.006

OSF
1

Hoffmann, J., Lenhard, A., Sebald, A., & Pfister, R. (2009). Movements or targets: What makes an action in action–effect learning? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(12), 2433–2449.

https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902922079

OSF

 

Books, Book Chapters

2

Pfister, R. (2023). Operationalization and generalization in experimental psychology: A plea for bold claims. In D. Gozli & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Experimental Psychology: Ambitions and Possibilities (pp. 45–60). Springer International Publishing.

 
1

Pfister, R., Foerster, A., Schwarz, K. A., & Wirth, R. (2014). Lässt sich ein guter Hochstapler als solcher entlarven? Wenn ja: Wie? In W. Schwanebeck (Eds.), Über Hochstapelei: Perspektiven auf eine kulturelle Praxis (pp 63-72). Berlin: Neofelis Verlag.

 

 

Editorials, Book Reviews, German Papers

8Giesen, C. G., Janczyk, M., Dignath, D., Pfister, R., & Moeller, B. (2023). Das Puzzle im Kopf: Wie Wahrnehmungseindrücke und Handlungspläne entstehen. In-Mind Magazine1.Web
7

Yang, C.-T., Cousineau, D., & Pfister, R. (2020). Editorial: Are sequential sampling models the future gold standard of cognitive psychology? The Quantitative Methods for Psychology16(2), 71-72.

https://doi: 10.20982/tqmp.16.2.p071

 
6

Pfister, R., Kunde, W., & Camus, T. (2020). Book review: Experimental psychology and human agency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(7).

https://doi: 10.1177/1747021820915343

 
5

Frings, C., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Hommel, B., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Moeller, B., Möller, M., Pfister, R., & Philipp, A. (2020). Merkmalsintegration und Abruf als wichtige Prozesse der Handlungssteuerung – eine Paradigmen-übergreifende Perspektive [Feature integration and retrieval as core processes in action control - a cross-paradigm perspective]. Psychologische Rundschau71(1), 1-14.

https://doi: 10.1026/0033-3042/a000423

 
4Janczyk, M., & Pfister, R. (2015). Von der Basis zur Anwendung: Kognitionspsychologie und ihre Bedeutung für den Alltag. Teil 2: Lernen und Gedächtnis. In-Mind Magazine4.Web
3Janczyk, M., & Pfister, R. (2014). Von der Basis zur Anwendung: Kognitionspsychologie und ihre Bedeutung für den Alltag. Teil 1: Wahrnehmung und Handlung. In-Mind Magazine2.Web
2

Pfister, R., Janczyk, M., & Kunde, W. (2013). Editorial: Action effects in perception and action. Frontiers in Cognition4, Article 223.

https://doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00223

 
1Pfister, R., Janczyk, M., & Kunde, W. (2010). Los, beweg dich! – Aber wie? Ideen zur Steuerung menschlicher Handlungen. In-Mind Magazine4, available online.